>>11065935Questions like 'is sun shinning?' could be well defined, but not properly understood, especially going trough different education or translation of the question (language meaning)
Without over here it doesn't make sense. In universe sun is probably shining if we're not dead yet on this planet.
What would you do if you ware totally unnecessary? There is no function to optimize, and humans can be grown in artificial wombs, GMO best humans?
How do you decide best? Best what? Even conscious things want to be "one" in fact there is one planet for now, and organism living here need to take care, so I would go away from giving it robot head, and maybe computers would like direct control over our bodies, just to save the planet for... wait for it... again us.
Conscious things doing voluntary stuff or stuff without reasons like "my leader, me follow" may be bigger disaster than unconscious computer acting on it's own.
Both maybe disaster. We need more information around us, that's the way to get people to decide, and some information that is around whole time, like ... packet on product. Not information that is just bunch of random words that anybody can misinterpret by their perspective.
Is there way to decide which "mathematical being" is weaponize and way to tell it really is "mathematical being on transistor" than human? Why would abuse human if mathematical being on transistor can process a lot of information in certain way?
Maybe programmers don't tell proper mathematical being to a computer to exist that would have proper tendencies they need and they are afraid that they'll be much slower if their world is also just a bunch of arguments in a function.
I know one thing, people are really bad at explaining things, especially precision in sequence they have, because with "this boots" being same model and brand, it's really hard to tell what they mean.
Maybe cooperation is easier for people who cooperate all over again, but this group is closed.
