/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11060934

66KiB, 717x717, 193.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 08:39:09 2019 No.11060934 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11061214 >>11061266 >>11061274 >>11061642 >>11061648 >>11063975

is there any bigger scam than proof by mathematical induction?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 08:43:32 No.11060937 Report

Quoted By:

It's not a scam.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 12:30:50 No.11061214 Report

Quoted By: >>11061266

>>11060934
>is there any bigger scam than proof by mathematical induction?
Proof by contradiction, a total meme,

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 55646602_10158683352183508_88746 (...).jpg, 59KiB, 564x850

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 12:34:36 No.11061222 Report

Quoted By:

so i'm trying mad honey now

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 13:14:35 No.11061266 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060934
>>11061214
>t. can't into foundations

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 13:21:22 No.11061274 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060934
>if you set up a line of dominoes and knock over the first one, they all fall down
If you have trouble accepting this, you may be a brainlet

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1569294671455.png, 19KiB, 500x523

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 13:23:02 No.11061280 Report

Quoted By:

don't fall for it

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 15:55:07 No.11061642 Report

Quoted By: >>11061648

>>11060934
proof is a scam in general.
the fact that we have any axioms at all indicates that every theorem is really just an assumption.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 15:57:04 No.11061648 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060934
It is one of the more acceptable techniques mathfags have engineered for their autism games, I'm a big fan as a committed anti-platonist.
>>11061642
based retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 16:00:29 No.11061659 Report

Quoted By: >>11061668

Natural numbers are literally defined the way they do so they'll work well with induction
Addition, multiplication, etc. are defined inductively and you have to do induction to prove their basic properties
Without that you can't reason about them at all

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 16:05:42 No.11061668 Report

Quoted By: >>11061682

>>11061659
Not a real justification, repeating basic facts from intro to proofs classes isn't thinking anon. try again.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 16:11:14 No.11061682 Report

Quoted By:

>>11061668
Wow, I am angry right now ;^)

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 11:00:07 No.11063966 Report

Quoted By:

induction on unidentified sets

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 11:06:26 No.11063975 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060934
All of discrete mathematics is a joke.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches