/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11060532

26KiB, 520x461, D89BF3CF-ABD8-4B52-9490-E074923207C5.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

dx

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 04:39:06 2019 No.11060532 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11060587 >>11060790 >>11063282 >>11063338 >>11063358 >>11063580 >>11064249 >>11064291

What the FUCK is it’s problem?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 04:45:54 No.11060549 Report

Quoted By: >>11060572

I warned you about infinitesimals.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 04:55:52 No.11060572 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060549
There’s no such thing, anon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 05:01:18 No.11060587 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060532
dx is fucking based anon, get with the times

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 05:03:18 No.11060593 Report

Quoted By: >>11060835

For me, it's $\frac{d^3y}{dx^3}$

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 06:09:16 No.11060728 Report

Quoted By: >>11063623 >>11064275

Latex noobs, all of you. The "d" is not a variable, hence, it's not math cursive.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 06:46:48 No.11060790 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060532
Looks like an ordinary form to me.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 07:18:51 No.11060835 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060593
What about the Chad $\frac{d^{n-1}y}{dx^{n}}$

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 10:53:36 No.11061069 Report

Quoted By:

This meme is derivative.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 11:16:20 No.11061102 Report

Quoted By: >>11061239

for me it's $\partial{x}$

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Oct 2019 12:48:59 No.11061239 Report

Quoted By: >>11064358

>>11061102
Only partially for me

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 03:20:50 No.11063282 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060532
He’s not as big of a cunt as d $y$

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 03:34:47 No.11063308 Report

Quoted By:

integral from a to b of F(x), dx

sum up heights multiplied by infinitesimal widths

integral of f(x)*dx

? means summa

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 03:55:03 No.11063338 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060532
It's perfect

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 04:04:28 No.11063358 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060532
for me its d?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 06:06:09 No.11063552 Report

Quoted By:

Ok so basically it's very smol

Solivagus (Polynomial Philosopher)

Solivagus (Polynomial Philosopher) Wed 16 Oct 2019 06:29:48 No.11063580 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060532
The question giver, obviously.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 06:52:53 No.11063623 Report

Quoted By: >>11064074 >>11064275

>>11060728
latex should know that

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 11:42:31 No.11064031 Report

Quoted By: >>11064311

for me it's f with a dot above it, and the antiderivative is f with a dot below it

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 12:11:21 No.11064074 Report

Quoted By:

>>11063623
The actual convention varies wildly between fields and regions. Making the default "correct" by one standard just makes it incorrect by all the others.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 14:06:25 No.11064249 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060532
For met it's xD

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 14:20:47 No.11064275 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060728
BEHOLD
$\text{d}z=\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{\partial z}{\partial x_i}\text{d}x_i$
>>11063623
shut up retard, no it shouldn't

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 14:21:32 No.11064277 Report

Quoted By:

For me it is $D_{\vec{u}}ff$

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 14:25:23 No.11064285 Report

Quoted By:

For me it is $\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} \delta x$

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 14:28:53 No.11064291 Report

Quoted By:

>>11060532
proof everyone on /sci/ are just a bunch of undergrad scum.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 14:34:31 No.11064311 Report

Quoted By:

>>11064031
>f with a dot below it
Does anyone actually write it like that?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 14:35:49 No.11064316 Report

Quoted By: >>11064323 >>11064326 >>11064343

For me it is $\vec{\Nambla}f$

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 14:37:22 No.11064323 Report

Quoted By: >>11064343

>>11064316
$\vec{\nambla}f$

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO c56f7abddc0723f765e7907f81150f78.jpg, 109KiB, 799x533

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 14:38:54 No.11064326 Report

Quoted By:

>>11064316
>Nambla

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 14:45:57 No.11064343 Report

Quoted By:

>>11064316
>>11064323
PEDO ALERT

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 14:46:40 No.11064345 Report

Quoted By:

for me it is an infinitesimal positive change in some quantity

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Oct 2019 14:59:39 No.11064358 Report

Quoted By:

>>11061239
$x \mathrm d$

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches