>>11049457Yes I can.
From the book the 'selfish gene' (a absolute must read btw):..
Say there was an even more imbalanced situation that human incels.
Take elephant seals. In an elephant seal colony only a few % of the males actually reproduce. The rest are basically celibate or die in fights with the chads that reproduce.
You might ask in that situation why don't elephant seals stop having so many males? Seems like a waste right?
Let's consider what happens if they do: If elephant seals could 'decide' or 'evolve' to produce 99% females and 1% males... Then we could think about a population in which there are 99% females and 1% males. Now as a INDIVIDUAL elephant seal.. it pays you a SHITLOAD to have a male, because if you have a male child your genes spread like WILDFIRE... whereas if you have a female child you can only have the normal amount of offspring.
So.. there is a massive evolutionary pressure to create MALES... this will revert the balance back to 50%. Infact in most species it's self balancing exactly at 50% because of how reproduction works. 50% genes from mom 50% genes from data.
Any movement away from the 50% would genetically PAY the smaller ratio to increase itself.. until it self balances.
Yep. Nature doesn't give 2 shits about incels, no matter how many schools you shoot up. The media might care but, ESS ratios and math don't care ;P
