Did males evolve to suffer?

No.11048870 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>be natural selection
>make two sexes, one which is disposable and one which isn't
>make 80% of the less disposable sex only breed with 20% of the disposable sex
>the disposable sex is meant to compete amongst themselves to get into the top 20% of their sex but the less disposable sex has to do no such thing
Is this actually efficient? What if they were equally disposable? Why do 80% of males of every single organism have to be so biologically disposable?
There's a coin that's tossed and there's a 50% chance in every species that you're born a male, and then there's an 80% than you're born to be useless cannon fodder.
WHY IS MALE GENOCIDE A THING?