>>11045272Only if you assume excluded middle (all statements are either true or false). Which, if you notice, is a sentence that says something about all possible sentences. So in most languages we immediately hit a wall. It is also obvious that this doesn't hold up in real life. The statement "X is big" is not true nor false. It is actually a logic function, where the implicit argument is the context. And things can be big and not big at the same time. For example, 10 inches for Natasha the slut may be standard, but for Sally the Evangelical Christian that is a monster. Another approach is to force excluded middle. For example, suppose we were autistic. We would then go on to remove all context, remove all interpretations, and then explicitly define what "big" is. We may say that "big" is precisely 11 inches or more. And then we can have excluded middle, as 11 inches are 11 inches. And so 10 inches are just 10 inches, no matter how hard Sally is screaming.
