>>11041362Thats a very self defeating concept and makes huge assumptions based on a narrow paradigm, that all come across as manipulative sabotage.
You promote the best people in their respective fields because its allows the best of the species to further their lineage so down the line humans are no considerably more intelligent and able to effectively work as a group at the same time. Also by not doing so you are handicapping a individual for going above mediocre and contributing while doing far more harm to the group from stagnation. When its been shown to be a synergistic effect for those around a higher output individual. This has been shown in numerous studies for nurture vs. nature, 1st world countries wouldn't exist without it.
The reason why Europeans have not only ruled the world for thousands of years but, created the very concepts for civilization has been based on Europeans having the most to universally offer the human species and not letting jungle savages impede their altruistic expansion.
Your entire idea is that the strong must cuck out which goes against survival itself on this planet and hurts everyone in the end far more then the strong just ruling.
Pal pot and communism as a whole otherwise have shown you get tyrant dictators when you let low iq peasants govern something they have no understanding of and everyone starves in misery. Gee sounds fun pushing retardation as a viable life path for intelligent people.
