>>11041269I already know, I just think it's a nonsensical criticism. Being able to define things means we understand what they are, it summerizes it in words and we are able to communicate over said concept or object, which is a needed to understand other concepts or objects built on top of it. It is a necessity, so the criticism is pointless. Also, just because one thing is hard to define it doesn't mean (a) everything else is (b) it can't ever be accomplished (c) it's pointless.
It's like saying something is a social construct. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist or doesn't have an impact of reality.
