>>11038591though I like your ending remark, your answer is lacking anon. Its like asking "Why do deaf people like music?" Giving an answer "because they do" isn't sufficient.
>>11038850>why do girls do X>replies with why do boys do Xits okay to ask why one gender does something without getting triggered about no one asking the other way
>>11038929holy shit based. best answer ive ever seen thus far. bless your soul anon
>>11039005we were shown this photo day in and day out in history class. pretty wholesome but they all went to fight on the wrong side.
>>11039282Oh man, I must say, I really enjoyed reading this post. Firstly, I read both of your links and I found them to be laughable. It almost seems as though the researchers began with their set out conclusion (that women are actually smarter than men but never "get the opportunity") and just extrapolated from there. None of their research correlates at all with the current literature. They are testing on school children; a subject which has proven to exaggerate sex differences siding with girls given the disproportionate amount of women teachers. Perhaps one thing we might agree on here is this: If we are to ever "solve" this issue, its by means of gender segregated learning. If women are truly so smart, let them get results on their own. All the while, they are not burdening men with their PC culture and zero-tolerance policies which diminish the motivations of boys.
Beyond the above suggestion, I would like to discuss some of the scientific literature. Its understood that men dominate both ends of the IQ chart; women are on average higher in IQ, but are few in representation on the far end of the spectrum, i.e, men make up most of the geniuses. Since we are just citing blogs too, I'll just go easy and link a liberal post:
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1995-07-07-mn-21052-story.html.
