>>11037621does this need repeating?
>>11037600>maybe people who post cartoon frogs aren't intelligent enough to learn from stupid questions.first, you made an assumtpion that i am replying to myself instead of merely showing that i am continuing to speak, via 2 posts. then you made a 2nd assumption that i was pretending.
your first lesson, is that not everyone operates like you, your second is that suspicion when confronted with opinions on your state of intelligence, however high or low that might be, says little more than 'shit, my loaded question is exposed'.
why did you make this thread?
