/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11036863

914KiB, 1200x544, Prove_me_wrong.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 14:55:20 2019 No.11036863 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11038567 >>11038938 >>11038994 >>11039295

>Pure math is to analytic spergs as applied math is to continental chads.
Is this correct?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2019 15:25:29 No.11036921 Report

Quoted By: >>11036948

>Is this correct?
What have you tried?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO index.jpg, 12KiB, 300x168

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2019 15:38:42 No.11036948 Report

Quoted By: >>11037085 >>11037117 >>11037118

>>11036921
> Not embracing Thomism, the perennial philosophy

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2019 16:42:11 No.11037085 Report

Quoted By:

>>11036948
You saved the thumbnail like a retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2019 16:52:00 No.11037117 Report

Quoted By:

>>11036948
Thanks for proving you're an idiot without any effort on my part.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2019 16:53:34 No.11037118 Report

Quoted By: >>11038509

>>11036948
lol the retard saved the thumbnail

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 06 Oct 2019 22:09:13 No.11037793 Report

Quoted By:

'Bump

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO gka22lkyk6k21.jpg, 191KiB, 1280x720

Anonymous Mon 07 Oct 2019 05:49:57 No.11038509 Report

Quoted By:

>>11037118
You don't even need to read the text to see that the thomist is the CHAD

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Oct 2019 06:36:53 No.11038567 Report

Quoted By:

>>11036863
If you need it to be.
>Pure math is to applied math as analytic philosophy is to continental philosophy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Oct 2019 10:33:21 No.11038938 Report

Quoted By: >>11038989 >>11039052 >>11039139 >>11039302

>>11036863
Pure math generates novel results, applied math doesn't.
Both analytic and continental philosophy generate novel results, but only one generates results that aren't BS.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Oct 2019 10:56:50 No.11038989 Report

Quoted By:

>>11038938
pure math solves sudoku puzzles

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 446-pure-math-vs-applied-math.png, 39KiB, 473x226

Anonymous Mon 07 Oct 2019 10:59:10 No.11038994 Report

Quoted By:

>>11036863

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Oct 2019 11:33:58 No.11039052 Report

Quoted By: >>11039136

>>11038938
>only one generates results that aren't BS.
Which one?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Oct 2019 12:46:26 No.11039136 Report

Quoted By:

>>11039052
Mathematics of course.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Oct 2019 12:48:11 No.11039139 Report

Quoted By:

>>11038938
Contrary to pupilar [sic] belief there are some amount research going on in ((( applied ))) math. And applications inspire new research. That isn't to say there isn't a great deal of truth to statements like that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Oct 2019 14:28:51 No.11039295 Report

Quoted By:

>>11036863
Pure mathematicians know why everything works but can't make anything work.
Engineers don't know why things work, but can make things work.
Applied mathematicians are the middle ground. They don't know why things work and can't make anything that works. A truly blessed field.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Oct 2019 14:30:57 No.11039302 Report

Quoted By:

>>11038938
>applied math doesn't.
The impression I have is that the proportion of new work to "just work" is about the same in both pure and applied maths but idk

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches