>>11031293My point is that preventing extinction is a more radical shift than causing it. Just as artificially stopping climate change is actually a more radical break from the past than causing it.
>>11031546Did he?
>>11031263>I'll die if it gets a bit warmerAlso none of you are scientists if you advocate not subjecting systems to new inputs. Sorry not sorry. We have enough data on the world as it is for us to have gotten to a tipping point where we'll learn more by changing it.
If you went into a chemistry lab and said "nooooooooo you can't use the bunsen burners to heat things" you'd be rightly seen as unscientific, since the whole point of doing experiments (and thus learning, using the scientific method) is introducing things to new inputs.
