>>11029204What do you mean by "really existing"? We can only talk about things we perceive, we can't be sure of what external reality is, because we see it only the way our mind makes us see it. So, asking if time really exist doesn't make sense scientifically, just like it doesn't make sense to ask if space, heat, objects exist. It turns out that time is a useful concept in the modeling of how we perceive things, so we use it. But, and I agree with Kant with this, it doesn't make any sense to ask if it exists outside our perception.
