>>11019762I don't know who Ayn is you terminal schizo.
>Here's an idea: offering higher wages for public teachers might just attract big-brain, non-"losers"But that isn't what you said. You said you wanted to raise their compensation so that they'd care, so don't change the goalpost. My response to that is that no matter how much you pay them, they'd still be mediocre retards.
Now, to address your goalpost-moving point. Sure, we could raise compensation for new teachers but first we'd need to:
>get rid of teacher unions>cleanse the mediocre retards to make room for the new teachersTwo things I'm sure you despise. But unless you pull those triggers, the economics don't add up. You can't give high paying jobs to everyone. School choice is a good way to pull those triggers but orange man bad and devos woman bad.
I wish we could help the poor. But you fuckers are using the poor as a tool to give free jobs to retards who depend on the unions because they are so useless they wouldn't have a job otherwise. All of that to keep the power you get from those sweet union fees. I honestly hope kids start waking up and start teacher-only school shootings.
