>>11018996>Are ideas like free will, agency, and responsibility possible if the universe is ordered?Not only is free will impossible but it's impossible to even conceptualize on a basic physical level.
Even if a free will believer was given the ability to assemble a theoretical physics framework for a completely new univeres, he wouldn't be able to incorporate free will.
>>11019059>truly randomTrue chaos/probabilism mauls free will even more than determinism, since humans just trurn from predetermined automatas into chaotic ones.
>>11020038>ConsensusWhich means literally nothing. Germ theory also went again the "consensus" at the time- why, because people are fucking retarded and often don't want to alter their preexisting fundamental notions of reality.
Also, "consensus" amongst whom? Psychology and philosophy pseuds that exclusively operate in the field of idealized and macroscopic concepts? Some random physics undergrad who's thought like 2 minutes on the subject in his life and just spouts some learned opinion? Opinions, backed by nothing, are fucking worthless, no matter who holds them.
