/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11012523

14KiB, 225x225, 1506098522365.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Why don't we use planckseconds instead of femtoseconds?

Anonymous Sat 28 Sep 17:59:08 2019 No.11012523 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11012593 >>11013345 >>11013381

We can say absolute times like 293938x10-40 plankseconds PM

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 Sep 2019 18:26:27 No.11012593 Report

Quoted By: >>11013229

>>11012523
>absolute times
Oh no, it's retarded...

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1448864632977.jpg, 7KiB, 219x230

Anonymous Sat 28 Sep 2019 21:53:23 No.11013229 Report

Quoted By:

>>11012593
it's planck time

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 Sep 2019 22:26:58 No.11013345 Report

Quoted By: >>11013438

>>11012523
Time gets more difficult to measure the shorter it gets

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 Sep 2019 22:39:31 No.11013381 Report

Quoted By:

>>11012523
because I'd rather use 0.5 femtosecond time steps in my molecular dynamics simulations rather than some ungodly hueg number of planckseconds.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 Sep 2019 22:52:58 No.11013438 Report

Quoted By: >>11013456 >>11013465

>>11013345
What's the smallest measuring stick we can use?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 Sep 2019 22:57:48 No.11013456 Report

Quoted By: >>11013465

>>11013438
probably your dick

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 Sep 2019 22:59:45 No.11013465 Report

Quoted By:

>>11013438
>>11013456
oh snap

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches