>>11005279This kid isn't someone who genuinely thought about things, even at a 16-year old level. She is either wilfully ignorant or genuinely malevolent.
The cause she espouses is deliberately harmful.
https://www.peoplesdemands.org/>no nuclear>no biofuel>no geoengineering>no CCS>no large-scale power (and therefore no heavy industry)>unrealistic demands for decarbonisationThese people are the Maoists of the 21st century and will, if they take power, kill millions of people.
The alternative to coal-powered electricity in the third world is wood fires, which choke infants to death. The alternative to heavy industry is subsistance agriculture, which they perhaps desire but most do not.
The alternative to nuclear is renewables, which cannot supply reliable, cheap power to the industrialised world. France shows us that nuclear works. Germany shows us that renewables do not.
The alternative to geo-engineering is untempered climate change, which is the opposite of what they claim to want.
These people are far worse than global warming deniers, they actively seek to sabotage the most effective methods of dealing with the problem and impoverish millions of people at the same time.
This girl is the figurehead for one of the most dangerous movements of the 21st century.
