The Requirements on the Non-trivial Roots of the Riemann Zeta

No.10999438 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Hello, So I posted my attempted Riemann Hypothesis Proof earlier in January.
Overall, the concept was sound, and at least among the few people who have since reviewed it.
However, I eventually did ferret out an error, not in the overall approach, but in one of the sub-sections, the old section 5.
The claim in that section was correct, but my method for showing it contained a sign error and therefore was wrong.
This version fixes that by instead using a more rigorous and clear approach to that portion.
Not only that, but it also addressed multiple formatting, readability, explanatory, and quality of life improvements.
This version is much cleaner, more succinct, and down from 14 or 15 pages to 11.