>>10994529All this being said, take my viewpoint with a grain of salt.
I'm the weird guy that is still backing the claim that photons are actually what we used to think of as "gravitons" but function just a little bit differently than expected.
I see the results of the double slit experiment as a perpetual coincidence, and I don't directly acknowledge light particle-wave duality.
I believe they are separate phenomena that we observe as the same, because the limits of perception from within space-time.
I make conjecture about the structure of these things outside of space-time and apply it to belief.
(You can't experimentally test conjectures outside of space-time, so my ideas can't be said to be wrong, but they can't be acknowledged as correct by the current burden of proof that peer review and actual science dictates.)
I don't enjoy the pseudoscience moniker, but it gets applied to ideas that are on the fringe of testability.
I spend most of my "think tank" time, attempting to come up with a way to experimentally test my ideas.
This is the greatest flight of fancy I have, on a regular basis.
However, I am willing to state my belief that I am certain there is a direct relationship between photons and gravity that has yet to be properly explored, and it, in my opinion, is responsible for matter and observable relativity within space-time.
I also enjoy things like "The Optimum Theory" those guys have similar ideas, but also attempt to make practical models that reflect the idea, while displaying what is ACTUALLY observed within space-time.
