>>10989044Deconstructing math like that only leads to the conclusion that abstract thought itself doesn't exist, which puts someone at the equivalent of a 60 IQ nigger in a sub saharan village, or a particularly smart chimpanzee.

Yes obviously numbers don't "exist", neither real nor imaginary, but we can think about them as if and form axioms around them to work with them. Imaginary numbers don't exist, because they are an abstract concept of 2 dimensional coordinates, but you can obviously use them to prove and calculate things and get the right result.