>>10985066You Are conflating effects. There is too much to unpack in that chart,
It is a stupid chart,
since it is tracking 4 values per stat,( a chart at most should be 2).
But let’s take the United States for simplicity all your chart REALLY says is people who have money have better kids (because high iq parents have hAve iq kids and HERE high iq parents are richer).
Take qutar, kids in private school do better either way, but it doesn’t show you why.
A much better graph would compare private and public school scores AND private and public school scores after socio-economic factors
*****So you could look at rich kids in public schools and see how they do*****
(Also wtf does “socio-econ status” mean? Just say economic status, is socio code for race?)
>>10985066>What's the use of privaate schools?Elite kids will always get better schooling, even if government forced private schools away, they would hire tutors or homeschool and basically this
>>10985120One last thing though, not all private schools are created equal, private school=!elite school a lot of private schools are kind of shitty
