>Hence follows the result of all previous inquiry: "All synthetic axioms a priori are no more than principles of possible experience" and can never relate to the things in themselves, but only to appearances, as in objects of experience. So pure Mathematics as well as pure Naturalscience may never relate to anything more than appearances and can only envision which expereince enables or that which from these principles can be envisioned in any possible expereience.
>Kant: Prolegomena to any future Metaphysics

Why even bother with natural science if all you are ever able to do is understnad the world as you can possible expereince it, not as the world in itself is? We are forever limited from gaining that knowledge.I think I'm gonna live in a forest by a waterfall and a meadow. Maybe Canada? Maybe Montana? Maybe Alaska, idk, but this here: /sci/, as a whole, is a waste of time.