>>10982877Nobody's saying that any of the sciences should not exist at all, but rather that the proportion of people with degrees in each one of those fields ought to be vastly different.
For every natural scientist, there ought to be 100 or 1000 engineers.
In addition, it would be somewhat conflicting to call something like anthropology or psychology a science, even though they do not apply the same criteria for truths as chemistry or physics. I'm not claiming that they have no place in the world, but I am claiming that it would be an equivocal use of such words.
Philosophy, Literature, and Art History can probably be easily dispensed, since all of the world's wisdom and beauty can be found in ancient works like Plato's Dialogues, the Bible, and the Epic of Gilgamesh. Degrees like paedagogy, especially with a focus on properly teaching science/mathematics/critical thinking skills and not just daytime babysitting plus rote memorization, ought to be strongly promoted.
