>>10983573>Architecture on Orion's propulsion and fuel for landing has not been thought out yetWait, what the fuck? Are they serious? I thought this thing was fucking done by now.
>SLS will only be used to launch Orion once or twice a year and cannot carry any elements of Gateway without more moneyWait, what the fuck? I thought SLS launching the major LOP-G component was the entire lynchpin of their moon architecture.
>Artemis currently has a 51% success potential under this design and Apollo is simpler and safer with an 80% success probability, a single launch failure means disaster for the entire missionHoly fucking shit. I mean, yeah, this plan of theirs left no room for error with their dozen launches of minor components, but 51% is still pretty fucking damning.
>Zero commitment to boots on the moon by 2024Disappointing. Pathetic, even.
Jesus Christ, what a mess.
