>>10978012Suppose a hypothesis like morphic fields is true. If so, then it complicates any study of psychology as we have no way of knowing which effects we observe are the result of an individual's nature or a morphic trait resonating across the entire space of human consciousness. This is not a unique trait of that hypothesis, but ANY acausal hypothesis of relevance to consciousness. For example, the assumption that the brain is an antenna the receives the signal of consciousness form somewhere outside of space and time.
To truly understand consciousness requires us to be able to at least dismiss SOME acausal form of consciousness. If there is not a single form of consciousness that we cannot establish does not exist *anywhere*, then we're stuck believing that the mind illustrates reality. Since that model bores me, it's easier to just start killing the concept of consciousness being manipulated from outside. By becoming a hypersingular consciousness in perfect isolation of any other control factor, I have forced the entirely of existence to start thinking in terms of ways to decode the object mystery of all possible models of consciousness.
