/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #10969748

121KiB, 659x729, 1568395958546.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 17:36:11 2019 No.10969748 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>10969770 >>10969771 >>10969772 >>10970375 >>10970789 >>10970796 >>10970923 >>10971317 >>10971427 >>10971489 >>10971761 >>10972549 >>10974882

When does /sci/ wake up to the idea that their precious science is fanfiction

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778

I wonder how much of "settled science" is actually junk

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 2019 17:41:58 No.10969770 Report

Quoted By: >>10972553

>>10969748
>research suggests
Yeah no shit undergrad retards can't do anything right, let alone replicate a complicated experiment

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 2019 17:42:14 No.10969771 Report

Quoted By: >>10969820 >>10973406

>>10969748
reproducibility crisis applies to soft sciences, maybe some areas of medicine/biochemistry if you squint enough

I am afraid our precious science ain't going anywhere

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 2019 17:42:52 No.10969772 Report

Quoted By:

>>10969748
Are you just learning this now OP?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42QuXLucH3Q

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 2019 18:00:48 No.10969820 Report

Quoted By: >>10970405 >>10973911

>>10969771
What is the Cavendish experiment?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO red green.jpg, 15KiB, 276x183

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 2019 18:06:41 No.10969837 Report

Quoted By:

>mfw wiki how to articles have more scientific peer review than most credited "scientific studies"

It would appear true "scientists" are people like good old Red Green, and most everybody else is in it just to stay in academia and live off grants.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO red green.jpg, 15KiB, 276x183

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 2019 18:08:43 No.10969843 Report

Quoted By: >>10974994

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 2019 21:00:14 No.10970375 Report

Quoted By: >>10970409

>>10969748
>I wonder how much of "settled science" is actually junk
Most of IQ science for one

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 2019 21:05:07 No.10970405 Report

Quoted By:

>>10969820
What are you talking about, you do that shit in undergrad. Hell you can do that at home

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 2019 21:05:38 No.10970409 Report

Quoted By:

>>10970375

Okay but black people are still dumb anon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 2019 23:02:39 No.10970780 Report

Quoted By:

Most nerds can't reproduce themselves let alone science

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 2019 23:05:08 No.10970789 Report

Quoted By: >>10970861

>>10969748
>I wonder how much of "settled science" is actually junk
If it can't be reproduced it isn't settled science.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 2019 23:07:58 No.10970796 Report

Quoted By: >>10970803

>>10969748
If they do more research on the replicability of science and it doesn't show the same results as the research from this article does it prove it wrong or prove it right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 2019 23:09:59 No.10970803 Report

Quoted By: >>10971317

>>10970796
The research will mean whatever we want it to mean!
t. modern academic

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 13 Sep 2019 23:39:11 No.10970861 Report

Quoted By: >>10972066 >>10972560

>>10970789
>If it can't be reproduced it isn't settled science.

Men walking on the moon hasn't been reproduced by another nation. Does that mean the conspiracy theories about the moon landing being faked have some merit?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 00:07:19 No.10970923 Report

Quoted By:

>>10969748
90% or more of science studies are not reproducible.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 03:02:09 No.10971317 Report

Quoted By: >>10971320

>>10970803
>>10969748
Mostly affects areas of the social sciences.

Who would've known that surveys and qualitative interviews are very prone to manipulation by the researcher? The methodology of survey based research is just flawed. Often such research isn't research at all and very limited in what you can find out and conclude from.

Though on /sci/ most I assume are in the natural sciences not in the social sciences where I wouldn't be surprised if 90% in there was bogus. Nobody could really catch you anyway if you were to produce bogus.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 03:03:21 No.10971320 Report

Quoted By:

>>10971317
>social
>science
*social pseudoscience

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 03:49:45 No.10971402 Report

Quoted By:

This is why when you see any news report stating "A new study finds..." you should stop reading immediately.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 04:03:16 No.10971427 Report

Quoted By: >>10971454

>>10969748
You don't need to worry. It only affects social sciences and some parts of medicine and biology and chemistry.

It's extremely pronounced in sociology and psychology though. It just so much happens that the latter gave us the various junk science that only laymen are obsessed with (Such as IQ and MBTI).

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 04:16:39 No.10971450 Report

Quoted By: >>10971621

Where did this "settled science" phrase come from. I have literally never seen it before a week or two ago and suddenly every retarded anti-science culture war shitpost is acting like it's a fundamental pillar of whoever they're going after this time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 04:17:37 No.10971454 Report

Quoted By:

>>10971427
>Such as IQ

This is the most scientific part of psychology though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 04:43:17 No.10971489 Report

Quoted By:

>>10969748
> in a recent 10 day study my benis is pretty hard
>my peers cant get hard

yea its a damn shame those faggots dont like naked ladies

*whips out a bottle of baby oil

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 06:11:40 No.10971621 Report

Quoted By:

>>10971450
>Where did this "settled science" phrase come from.
Arguing with creationists, I think.
A lot of people have an idea of science where every idea is equally open to challenge at every point in time. It's as if we're equally likely to find out tomorrow that the details of the big bang and the fact the Earth orbits the Sun are wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 07:27:56 No.10971761 Report

Quoted By:

>>10969748
each scientist also faces his own reproduction crisis, if you know what I mean;)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 12:33:32 No.10972066 Report

Quoted By: >>10972512

>>10970861
>Another nation
Didn't realize review had to be by someone of a different nationality

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 17:27:21 No.10972512 Report

Quoted By:

>>10972066
peer review is usually done by another agency. You can't do your same experiment twice and claim you peer reviewed yourself. Space programs are usually government funded and since America has just the one, yes another nation would need to get involved.

Unless Elon can get his shit together, which will never happen. Elon is a dot com boomer, in that he got rich in the dot com boom/rush and has since used brute force/lotta cash as a business strategy. I don't think he's very business savvy. He just has a lot of weight to throw around cause he got lucky one time and became rich.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 17:40:34 No.10972549 Report

Quoted By:

>>10969748
>medicine
literally not science. not even trying to discredit medical professionals.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 93176AE7-DFE9-47DC-A479-FED59A01 (...).gif, 2MiB, 282x257

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 17:41:39 No.10972553 Report

Quoted By: >>10974854

>>10969770
>Unironically using undergrad as an insult

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 17:44:24 No.10972560 Report

Quoted By: >>10972706

>>10970861
Walking on the moon isn't science. Just like traveling from Los Angeles to NYC isn't science. They just did a thing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 18:43:12 No.10972706 Report

Quoted By: >>10973914 >>10973922

>>10972560
>space travel has nothing to do with science
>leaves thread
>makes new OP
>Scientifically speaking why was Hitler right?

I hate this board.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 14 Sep 2019 22:39:49 No.10973406 Report

Quoted By:

>>10969771
>Unlike you "soft scientists" we're always right
>By the way 96% of the universe for all intents and purposes doesn't exist. What do you mean prove it? It can't be measured! The math says so right here!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Sep 2019 02:17:57 No.10973911 Report

Quoted By:

>>10969820
>retard watches a bunch of conspiracy truther flat earth videos on YouTube
>takes their word at face value and makes a fool of himself on /sci/
Go back to /x/.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Sep 2019 02:21:48 No.10973914 Report

Quoted By:

>>10972706
>space travel has nothing to do with science
Who are you quoting? He said the act of walking on the moon itself isn't science, which is correct. The original retard was trying to make a terrible argument by implying that the moon landings some how never happened because they're "not reproducible", which is obviously a bogus argument. The actual science that made the moon landings possible (propulsion, materials, batteries etc) are all testable here on Earth and are reproducible.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Sep 2019 02:26:25 No.10973922 Report

Quoted By:

>>10972706
made me laugh.. because I don't want to face how true it is.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Sep 2019 11:51:47 No.10974854 Report

Quoted By:

>>10972553
>t. seething undergrad

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Sep 2019 12:09:22 No.10974882 Report

Quoted By:

>>10969748
>research making research seem illegitimate

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Sep 2019 12:40:46 No.10974961 Report

Quoted By:

Sometimes they have all the right material but all the wrong things. You can read research but they never go into too much detail as to what they are using they just describe its state but not quality. Like generic vs name brand.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Sep 2019 13:02:10 No.10974994 Report

Quoted By:

>>10969843
This is true.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches