>>10966283A lot of it is actually puesd science, stuff like proving a fire was arson as been proved to be completely wrong, but they still act like they are experts . DNA in theory is okay, but not if the cop takes a pubes and moves them onto her bedsheets or whatever. And that basically makes you a lap robot anyways, little better than x ray tech.
Also remember CSI is not real.
Anyways to sum up 99% of it is just being a lap tech, no better than someone who tests urine samples Ina machine and prints the reports 8 hours a day.
The .1% that are doing actully experimental science are much smarter than you
