>>10971966>I read archives of /pol/ and I'm well aware of the reason why race realism exists,The reason I assumed this isn't true is because of this comment of yours:
> I've seen plenty of people on /pol/ define improving the condition of the third world as anti-white because that means white countries wouldn't get as many resources.I frequent /pol/ more than you and I never saw this. When /pol/tards talk about something being anti-white they usually mean affirmative action, diversity quotas or some crazy tumblerina talking shit about white people. Not improving the conditions in the third world or whatever the fuck.
Which you would know if you read enough /pol/ threads so my guess is you either didn't read them or you are willfully lying.
>>PLEASE IGNORE ALL THE VIDEOS MADE BY WHITE NATIONALISTSThe only people making race realist content on youtube are Althype and Sean Last. I don't know about anyone else so I very much doubt you do. But these people are sadly exceptions among race realists.
The other sphere of race realist community (or hereditarians or HBD, it's the same) consists of people like Emil Kirkegaard, Noah Carl, Bo Winegard, Cory Clark or Nathan Cofnas. They aren't especially known on /pol/ so even if you indeed read hundreds of threads you may never heard of them. They certainly aren't white nationalists. They do it because they care about science believe it or not.
Then there are people like Murray who is political but isn't white nationalist. He is lolbetarian who is even against Trump. And of course old school hereditarian crowd like Eysenck, Jensen, Herrnstein or Lynn who aren't white nationalists either and if they were political then it is on same level as Murray.
So no, your theory about how the only reason race realism is being pushed us so that white supremacists could own the libs and want to exterminate brown people or whatever is false. If you say otherwise you are either lying or you don't know enough about this topic.
