>>10960283not really. if you want your computer to not crash randomly you need better performance than that. any stray 1 or 0 will cause it to segfault or BSOD.
even if you argue "but we'll only use quantum computing for, like, the big computing challenges like quantum computing" then you still need to double- and triple- and N-times- check the answer for important questions. and doing that leaves you back at classical performance.
i think this is the only real application:
>>10960263and in that case it's only an arms-race / military thing. hence why the topic of quantum computing is a giant fucking meme, because the military industrial complex with their 900 billion dollar annual budget got like 1% of their funding injected into physics, which is like insanely huge for physicists, so they all were like "holy fuck, giant gibs, man, let's meme this shit"
it's a disgrace.
