>>10961751But that's what physicist's do with their invented particles. There is not a thing that is discrete in ONE universe.
>>10960391Nothing I said was rhetorical, what part of "You cannot quantitatively predict that which exhibits no quantity", do you not understand?
>yeah well you're just assuuuuuming that it isn't physical and has no quantity because you're just dumb and can't into maths.No. Logically it would have no quantity because where would the quantity come from? Another universe? So then the the answer would yet again be "the universe created the universe" and we would be going down the holographic paradigm argument again.
Another magical place some other theory would imagine up? Give me a break. Show me a concrete discrete quantity before you start assuming there is actual quantity in the universe. It's qualitative, which is unquantifiable without arbitrary goalposts and standards of measure. There is no standard of measure in the universe.
