>>10957068GAMP is a new concept. It's also such a meaningless distinction. Tell me, how different is sex between a """""heterosexual""""" male and a GAM, and two homosexual men? It's still one male dick inside one male anus and no pussy in sight.
Do we really need to create a new sexual terminology because someone likes their gay partner to put on dresses? I mean, this sounds more like a fetish. And I'm fine with you creating new fetish terminology, we already have billions of retarded fetish words only 2 or 3 people world-wide actually apply for. But why mess with science terminology. You are just gay.
