>>10949228When everyone screaming about the problem simultaneously preach communism, and the only solution that they come up with is yet another tax, no shit it's going to become "partisian". Add to this the fact that so far the predictions haven't exactly turned out to be true, and people aren't believing the bullshit anymore. Hence dragging kids that haven't yet been exposed to the propaganda enough to notice it's not true.
>accept the dataData showing what? That the arctic has plenty of ice left when it was supposed to be "ice-free" in 2014? That a ~50% increase in global CO2 levels from fuck-all to fuck-all accounts for a 1 degree increase of global temperatures from 287 kelvin to 288 kelvin, and this is somehow going to kill us all UNLESS we introduce a feel-good tax that won't do shit since people will still consume resources as they did before?
If it's CO2 that's the big bad, then the solution is to replace coal and gas plants with nuclear plants, as those are the only real alternative. Wind and solar just can't meet the energy demand. If it's not CO2, then find the real culprit and come back to the discussion once you've found it.
Also, funny how I had to look quite hard for what the global average temp is, all the results talk about how the average is going up, yet the actual average temperature is hidden in a wall of text. Maybe they understand bitching about a 1 degree increase looks retarded when saying the average temp is 14.6C, and using the true scale kelvin makes it look really retarded.
If you want to tax CO2 to build nuclear plants, or at least do something with the money that would actually be useful, then we can have a discussion about whether it's good or not. If the only use for the money is virtue signalling and transferring cash to Africa/your own pocket, fuck off.
