>>10942894>Usually those with extremely low IQs are due to a genetic disease.That's just another way to say they're genetically low IQ. They inherited it from their parents, just like high IQ individuals did (excluding outliers).
>As for trends. Jewish/Asian Americans are more likely to go to college, but ultimately it's on the individual to see that happen.They also have higher average IQ's. Sadly someone with a low IQ will have great adversity in an academic setting so he's less likely to achieve this. Is it any surprise then that the same people who have, on average, higher IQ's, are also over represented in academia? You can argue that culture plays a role, and it does, but if Jews had an average IQ of 80 they would not be over represented imo.
>As for 3rd world there is huge wealth disparities and those wealthy live more luxurious lives than your average American but that is mainly due to nepotism of being born in a rich family.That's only the case for certain countries, usually Arab states full of oil, which represent a small % of the total world population. Most wealth is not inherited, most millionaires are self made.
>Jeff Bezos children will be successful.Aside from making an assumption that's fairly stupid, as most wealth is lost within 3 generations and he might as well overdose on a billion dollar yacht, I don't see how an anecdotal case, son of a billionaire, changes the reality that low IQ individuals are less likely to be successful in society? It's the equivalent of saying human height is irrelevant in basketball because it doesn't follow linearly that height = better at basketball even though height is a major and critical component of being successful at basketball. Likewise high IQ = more success isn't a necessary but is the expected result so turning around and saying IQ is irrelevant to success is as legitimate as saying that height is irrelevant to basketball because there are other factors at play as well.
