>>10932274>Camus one tier below absurdism, his own philosophyGood bait
>>10934040If a set has the cardinality (size) , it is said to be countably infinite. Examples include the set of natural numbers , the set of integers , and the set of rational numbers . (Yes: counterintuitively, all of these sets have the same size. This is because it is possible to construct a one-to-one function that maps every number in to every number in , or , and vice versa.)
The set of real numbers is denoted by the symbol , and its cardinality is denoted by the symbol . If , then the set of real numbers would be countably infinite. However, we have known for over a century that the set of real numbers is in fact uncountably infinite: that is, .
