>>10931728I like when people post statistics and evaluate them at face value. What you're doing here is spitting in the face of reality by posting this dogshit and implying that the world we live in isn't ridiculously sophisticated and can't just be represented by a bar graph.
There are a lot of reasons why race-mixed people would be predisposed to mental illness.
If you participate in and understand that racism exists, you should understand why someone who is a mix of two very segregated groups would have mental problems. If the two groups can barely get along in the first place, what makes you think either would take in someone who is race mixed? They're more likely to be ostracised by both.
>>10931740>>Offspring from interracial pairings are more likely to have mental illnesses >“Multiracial patients with rare blood diseases have an even harder time finding a bone marrow match,” Asklipiadis said, “and for matches to be successful, it’s important for donors and patients to share the same ethnic background.”I don't know if you implied it on purpose since the first article you linked makes it seem like it's a genetic thing that exists only in a vacuum, but 5 paragraphs in and it already tells you why you're wrong. IF that's what you were trying to say. This is why you don't save articles you don't read from other people you want to believe are right.
Now if you're trying to say it's bad to have mixed race children because there aren't enough donors, then sure. But even then the things that cause for a bone marrow transplant are too rare to make it something to worry about.
>>Interracial marriages are less likely to be stable marriages>After controlling for couple characteristics, the risk of divorce or separation among interracial couples was similar to the more-divorce-prone origin group. Also
>Existing work tends to be dated and focused primarily on Black-White marriages.You could make an argument against black and white but that's all and even ogsjgfds
