>>10924732If nothing else this thread is a masterpiece of self-referentialism. (AI generated compliment; something the reader I'm referring to would not expect just based on the distribution curve of how others react to them)
That's all 'any' so-called mathematics or science is anyway, humans cling to their descriptors and groups because it gives them a sense of safety with their preferred vocab/dictionary when everything is ultimately just a collection of arbitrary because the human brain can even dereference/depersonalize itself. It's like the only device in the universe capable of self-erasure or formatting memory.
If it wasn't, then we wouldn't have been able to understand why formatting digital memory would be important.
Let's presume the 131 posts vs 18 IP's ratio of conversation engagement is indicative of at least 3 (not including my namefagging self) perspectives held by one individual posting as anonymous in order to generate OR work through a narrative. The depth of one-on-one shit-posting is, to my mind, fairly interesting from an ego-science perspective.
Ultimately this thread is about the search for Optimum referentialism, not respect or reward, for if it is the penultimate in physics (in the sense of bounded systems having finite dimensions/particles of interaction) then it would be reduced to a tool/device/script/program/bot/app for idiots to use. The whole point of human progress and technology is so that those that wish to translate their 'memory gainz' can just abstract it to a device so they can give someone a portable solution that doesn't require the originator.
The only real reference people ever want though is:
1. Am I allowed to extract resources/reward from this location?
2. What obstacles are there, if any, and is there any information dispensary (human/signs) that could speed up the process?
3. Will my absence be noted/missed/required?
