>>10922705But how do we know if spikes like that didn't exist 10000 years ago, but which has been averaged out due to time? I mean, noisy spiky data is common, and to compare that to long term averaged data is unfair. In 100 years, then we'll have a better indication. Predicting the 5 year outcome of a stock/whatever using 1 days measurements is retarded.
And also, looking at a basic trend line, a temperature increase like this is even expected, pic related
