>>10908339How many real conversations about sex bots can you expect any remotely sane person to have IRL? This is not a subject you will ever talk about with most friends, colleagues or even family. The few rare opportunities I've had for this always points to the same: Men either embrace it or don't really care about it, publicly laugh about it (because they expect they're supposed to, and don't want to come off as weird to other people). Women at the very least consider it sad and pathetic, and on average are insulted and deeply disturbed by the idea.
>>10908327This.
History and present are full of examples about how women as a gender tend to have massive control issues, and an extremely primal emotional reaction to everything that is about other people. I mean, we're all selfish, every last one of us. But men do tend to have a much more relaxed view of the world, "live and let live", where women tend to believe they know better than others what's good for them and what's not.
It's about biological differences, leading to different psychological motives. My guess (yeah, I know, sci doesn't like guesses) is that women, as the ones to remain behind and raise the children would have logically developed a far stronger instinct for maternal activities: watching, teaching and controlling the do's and don'ts to the family. After all the men were busy hunting and warring, which likely meant the same it still does in today's world: when they came home, they were too tired to take care of the mundane tasks of cleaning, cooking, or looking after children. So it's not anyone's fault. From the female point of view, they nag, control, and stress about enforcing their wills on others because truthfully, someone had to do it. It just doesn't translate very well into today's world. Much like the overbearing aggression that's driving young stupid men into picking fights in schools and kiosks and crime syndicates, doesn't belong to this day either.