>>10907213what’s wrong with many worlds?
i like consistent histories but MW is much better than copenhagen crap because postulating exceptions to physics is dumb. pilot wave is retarded, and objective collapse is magical thinking. QBism is what most modern copenhagenists really believe in without realizing it, but then you’re left concluding that quantum mechanics is just a human phenomenon related to explaining how we model things, which almost turns physics into psychology or computer science, which is lame (this is basically what Lubos shills but erroneously calls it copenhagen).
i would like to note that ‘t Hooft has a superdeterministic interpretation, which is also valid but then you need to basically assume we aren’t learning physics ever because every measurement we “choose” to make was predetermined by some unobservable cosmic conspiracy, which also leaves you cold
CH and MW at least leave room for believing that physics is right and doesn’t require magic exceptions
