>>10894323It's not the matter of tolerance, but the fact that you require drugs to compete with natural talent. It means you must suffer the consequences to your body, and will never possess the natural talent.
>>10894344I put no one down. I told the truth. The nagging truth that you and the others have in the back of your minds. You know that you are using drugs to imitate those around you who have natural ability. You know, deep down, that you can never sustain a drug habit but the naturally talented simply continue onwards.
Even now you resort to ad hominems and beg for the approval and support of others. Do you not see that in the words you use against me? The pleading for agreement and support from others. It's obvious and a poor substitute for argument. You are telling me that you can't win an argument one on one. You didn't refute a single point I made either.
>He's also not right at all, it's just gatekeeping Quite a weak argument when we both know you're getting high to just -approach- the level of thought and ability of a naturally talented person. That means you're never going to be cut out for the real world where the demands and stakes are higher. Gatekeeping? Call it nature. Some people are more talented than you. If you can't compete with them without drugging yourself, then you should find something else you CAN succeed in.
