ITT people don't understand the definition and usage of the word "technocracy", a mistake further confused by the apparent "technical" nature of one set of disciplines versus the "untechnical" nature of the other.
Even so the OP has a valid point: all other things being equal, one naturally inclines toward a presumptive set of science-educated people over lawyers. But this has limits. Cucks like
>>10891621 (the worst post in the thread thus far) both misunderstand the definition of technocracy (hint: that they happen to be experts in "technology" and in government does not of-itself make them technocrats) and also fail to undestand that it's beta-cuck scientists who work out HOW (to put a man on the Moon) versus WHY (Kennedy: to wave our dick around, soft-power compete with the USSR and feel good about ourselves since we have money, and okay fine do some science too as an afterthought). The Kennedy/NASA dichotomy is particularly instructive to Science Awesome bugmen: in this case, science is only made possible because the political will has been marshalled, a "why" has been reasoned. Your "how" is secondary. In spite of this, I still personally incline towards the STEM-related, the practical. But if you don't understand the practical supremacy of the political Why in life, then you're blind.
People ITT also get cheating wrong (eventually, after mis-reporting your iron-smelting quota enough times, you only fuck yourself-unless you connive so that someone else takes the fall for your own stupidity, a special cynicism, which regrettably occurs with regularity).
But at all events, the following is true: the Chinese Communist Party is the most execrably evil entity existing in the world today. Yes, it is worse whatever muslims, pedophiles, jews, or American politicians you may have in mind. If I became a living god tomorrow, capable of anything, one of my very first actions would be to put down and overthrow the CPC at a stroke. And I would be right in doing so
