>>10886495Getting something from nothing breaks the laws of thermodynamics the only way to not break the law, would means there was no Big Bang only a galactic rebound on sorts. Image the universe being 6 light years in diameter then 4 then 1 then reaching an exponential small number just above 0 then expanding again to 1 then to 4 then to 6 and up and up and up from there. The smallest point couldn’t be 0 because we can’t permit for the creation of 3-axis of space since that would break the law. However, if we track back the expansion of time and space we see it needed to come from a single point but we have established that if it does come from a single point one of the laws of thermodynamics would be broken. So circa 13.8 billion years ago the universe had to just be bigger than 0 but not 0... easy and infinitesimal. There we go The shape of the universe before and after the last expansion was a hourglass shape with its narrowest point being an infinitesimal in diameter.BUT... infinitesimals don’t exist demonstrated here by this simple equation.
S=0.99999...
10S=9.9999...
10S-S=9.9999...-0.9999...
9S=9
S=1 But S is also equal to 0.9999 as we originally established.
And if we do...
(1-S)=(1-S)
1-1=1-0.9999...
0=0.0000...1
Thus proving all infinitesimals are equal to 0.
But if it’s equal to 0 then the universe emerged from a single point and there would be no evidence of a past and creating a universe from nothing breaks the laws of thermodynamics. Therefor there must be an external force that prompted the Big Bang. Whether it be god or our future selves someone must have done it.
