>>10881619I'm more focused on utility than pursuing the truest nature of the underlying basis. Which is fine, because I never claim I know with certainty things I don't know, nor do I make demands of the universe as far as what it "has to be".
I've lived in all the perspectives. At this point I think none of this is "real". We're all dreaming components of a greater dreamer. Ever have a lucid dream and try to convince someone they're in a dream? They will always argue with you, but, more importantly they will try to convince you it's real. That's the part I was most struck by. Why? Why would they do that? However, if you leave them be you can control them to a great extent using your will alone.
Turns out, the "real world" works the same way. This is a dream. You can control others directly, or through other means. When people meditate, connect to their "higher self", pray via "Jesus" or whatever else, this is what they're really doing. They're projecting their intent and desire to the superstructure, a greater dreamer we're all a part of, and causing it to alter events and synchronize things accordingly.
Anyway, you people don't care regardless and a lot more goes into it. But I've tested this, and it really is looking like this is how it is. This is all "real", and the corporeal form has to be taken care of, but not in the way we think.