>>10898504Hey you.
If I were trying to proof the circumstance in how matter came to exist.
What check points would I need to hit as validation of the equation?
I'm asking for your answer to this. Specifically you.
As it's seemingly is that you're the only person here, or most places to have an actual grasp of physics.
I may have hit on the answer to this, I'm getting things in solve, but not more than a few key items.
I have to know which ducks and in what order they should be found.
That way I can get the logic in order. And I'm sure you have a better sub atomic to macro interaction list in mind now, than I'd have in the time spend imploded into a organic web crawler.
I need the sum root of each increment property. Not a property that has a later or over complex (larger particle/functions out of place for causality) equation to explain it.
But do note it in the list should you feel that the concept is right, but the maths is fuzzy for it.
All I get else where is name calling or dumbfukardness.
Can't say what it is that's got this potential. Other than a logical uncertainty. If you're really clicked on as I think you might.
You may even take it and run. I've been saying it for a while. Just thought the uncertainty would be that easy to isolate.
I ran it, and it was the one. I thought there had to be more nuance. But it's in the orders of operation that that's gained.
Hope you can give a hand. Won't go forgotten.
