>All of accepted scientific literature: "Genes are responsible for all growth of the organism, only the genes"
>New theory: "Actually genes are just repositories of raw materials and it's the response to stimuli of the cell that determines most of an organism's growth, change the stimuli [chemical, radiological, etc including ultimately signals from the brain] and you can radically change the way the organism develops regardless of genes"
I don't know what the name of this theory is but it seems gaining ground. Is there any legitimacy to it?
>New theory: "Actually genes are just repositories of raw materials and it's the response to stimuli of the cell that determines most of an organism's growth, change the stimuli [chemical, radiological, etc including ultimately signals from the brain] and you can radically change the way the organism develops regardless of genes"
I don't know what the name of this theory is but it seems gaining ground. Is there any legitimacy to it?
