>>10871373Not the person you replied to, but he was being pretty disingenuous in that post.
Even though he tagged the post as non-technical, he claimed in a proposition (something that requires a proof in a mathematical sense) that trump was unfit for presidency and his "proof" was that it was mutual knowledge (i.e. he thought everyone knows it). Then he said he removed any post claiming the same thing about Hillary saying that it was it doesn't have anything to do with trump and says he doesn't believe Hillary was unqualified anyways.
In other words, he shilled for Hillary. In an election, the point is to compare two individuals. He made a claim about an individual running an election and immediately disallowed comparisons with his peer. In other words, he was blatantly shilling for Hillary (he even says more people should speak up about trump's unfitness).
You can suck tao's dick as much as you want in math where he is qualified. You can take his cock out of your mouth when he discusses things outside of his specialty.
