>>10871701>in the real world poor whites are still outscoring poor blacksIn the real world, from the mid-60's to the end of the 80's, poor blacks were sequestered by redlining into shitty neighborhoods with shitty schools.
When blacks are pitted against other races in classroom environments, they are presumed mentally inferior and thus lose out overwhelmingly on subjective evaluation by teachers, guidance counselors, or college interviewers, affecting their placement in college prep programs and tracks, and which schools they apply to.
These effects are real. Consider that we see similar effects in other nations, like with Koreans in Japan, with Irish in Britain, or with the varying castes in India. Even though race scientists don't argue for huge racial IQ gaps in those cases. Consider there were states where boomers went as far as closing down their school systems rather than integrating them, and those boomers' children eventually became the next teachers.
>because these poor little retards had a hard life so obviously it means their lower scores are actually secretly equal to the higher scores of others!Keep in mind the ultimate goal of these tests is not to rank students, but to identify (as in True or False) who has the intelligence and work ethic to succeed in school.
It's certainly not a perfect solution but the alternative is to continue enforcing a caste system. I suppose that's justified if you presuppose the poor are retards or whatever though.
