>>10870578Validating multi-verse and describing a new theoretical particle are hard sells without data or experimental confirmation.
The particle machinery to test and maybe create these new things needs to be multiple powers stronger than what we have today. A new LHC would need to be >50% larger and >2x as expensive just to get another power of ten output.
It's expected that for every next-level-down particle to be physically verified the requirements increase roughly and order of magnitude, for every step in the chain.
for example if the next major breakthrough takes 10^17eV, the next takes 10^19, the next 10^22, etc.etc.etc.
Adding to that, if the expected inflaton field interaction rate is even modestly correct, we should be able to extrapolate the rate at which universe-bubbles occur and exist, and be able to work out where expected universe bubbles have a chance of being observed.
And before anyone counter-spergs at me. This is all in the purely theoretical zone, so we should be dismantling it as hard as possible to help correct the research.
