>>10868848You have a point sort of. But the rest of that story isn't so wholesome as they deny their results and make up whole new effects to explain how the results that falsify their pet theory somehow didn't actually falsify it. It's like how flat Earthers deny that the sun sets (because that also falsies the flat Earth notion), and they claim that actually the light bends to make the illusion that the sun sets. Yet they'll never explain, model, nor test this idea.
