>>10853656Saying sexual activity has physiological repercussions isn't a "random nonsense idea". Regardless, OP is the one who first offered his hypothesis without any proof, so your burden of proof argument has little ground to stand on in this case. If OP came here saying
>ITT memes anons actually believe. I’ll startYou could indeed reply as you did. However, he didn't, nor did I. You're just a midwit unable to substantiate something he feels strongly about so you bring muh burden of proof up, meanwhile defeating yourself with it in the process.